Naturopathic Medicine & Homeopathy Articles
04/03/2011 - 23:01
06/19/2010 - 05:07
04/08/2010 - 04:23
04/08/2010 - 03:04
04/08/2010 - 02:45
04/08/2010 - 02:13
04/08/2010 - 01:53
04/08/2010 - 01:28
04/08/2010 - 01:22
04/07/2010 - 20:28
|
Naturopathic Medicine & Homeopathy Articles
Sun, 04/03/2011 - 23:01
As the profile of Naturopathic Medicine in North America has been on the rise in recent years, I have increasingly been contacted by prospective Naturopathic Medical students who are interested frank feedback on my education and career as a Naturopathic Doctor in Vancouver & Port Coquitlam, British Columbia.
gave me a plethora of useful skills that I still regularly use in my daily practice.
would no doubt attest to, there's no shortage of clinical work involved in getting the ND degree!
So, despite their seeming differences, there are a great many similarities between the depth, direction and focus of study in naturopathic and conventional (allopathic) medical schools alike.
______________________________
Dr. Andy Somody, B.Eng, C.B.H.T., C.C.H., N.D.
Naturopathic Doctor Certified Bowen Therapist Certified Classical Homeopath
______________________________
Sat, 06/19/2010 - 05:07
If I told you that you can get the same relief from your pain with either:
a). an invasive, potentially fatal surgery, or b). a risk-free sham procedure, which would you pick?
That's the question being prompted by the results of a multi-center, double blind, placebo controlled trial, entitled "A Randomized Trial of Vertebroplasty for Painful Osteoporotic Spinal Fractures", and published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2009.
This study compared the efficacy of vertebroplasty - a common surgical procedure involving the injection of bone cement into fractured vertebra - to a sham procedure.
The result?
In all outcomes measured - overall pain, pain at night, pain at rest, physical functioning, quality of life, and perceived improvement - there was no significant difference between the two groups at any time following the intervention.
Does this mean vertebroplasty is ineffective in relieving pain?
Not at all - it's very effective!
After all, there were significant improvements in all of the measured outcomes at each of the scheduled follow-ups.
But the improvements in the placebo group were just as great!
In fact, the only statistically significant difference between the two groups at all - the total QUALEFFO score at 1 week - favored the placebo group!
This, for me, is another beautiful affirmation of a common theme that is seen throughout many, if not all, aspects of medicine.
After all, it implies that the ultimate power to heal ourselves lies within each of us - something that I have been increasingly convinced of throughout my time in practice, and which I wholeheartedly utilize with my patients. Most patients do possess this capacity for self-healing within themselves, and simply need the proper healing trigger from a well-chosen external source of information. While I clearly believe that the homeopathic remedy is one of the best such triggers (if you don't know what I'm talking about, look at ... well, pretty much anything else on this site! :) ), a surgical intervention - or mock surgical intervention, as it turns out - can be just as healing.
That is - provided it's matched to the patient who needs it.
IMHO, all forms of medicine have at least some potential for healing inherent within them.
The only question which remains is WHICH medicine will be most healing for THIS given patient.
This is the place where individualization must occur, and where we doctors (IMHO) must set aside our alleged "expertise", and realize that no cookbook protocol can offer the same deeply curative results as a well-matched individualized prescription.
But, if this is true, why is it that the patients in this study improved?
After all, how could they have been well-matched? This was a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, a form of evidence which - in evidence-based medicine circles - is considered to be of higher quality than any other!
But do the subjects in the study really represent a random cross-section of people with osteoporotic spine fractures?
After all, by self-selection, only those who were willing to undergo the invasive vertebral injection would have signed up for this study in the first place!
This suggests that the patients in the study were those who, on some level, found the idea of this invasive treatment to beat least tolerable, if not somewhat appealing.
Thus, IMHO, these study subjects instinctively selected for themselves the treatment that, of all their alternatives, was the most well-matched to them!
Individualization at its finest :)
Interestingly, I also find that this is true in my practice.
I can't count the number of times that I have just discovered a way to treat a certain, very specific condition ... and, for the next few days, I'll be barraged by people with just that condition needing just that treatment!
A strange phenomenon, indeed, and one which I had a tendency to dismiss "short-term memory bias" in the past - until I experienced it so often that I could no longer deny there was something greater going on.
As has been my experience with homeopathy and energetic medicine in general - when I experience something again and again, no matter how inexplicable it may superficially seem, I cannot help but to simply know a deeper truth must lie somewhere therein.
This, IMHO, is the highest form of evidence available.
It is more than evidence - it is simply evident.
It is the kind of truth that you don't need a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to confirm.
And this is the level at which I prefer to work with my patients.
Although I have nothing against testing, and believe it to be valuable in supporting diagnosis and treatment decisions, I'm not fixated on what your test results suggest that you should or must be suffering from - after all, if you have Fibromyalgia or IBS, this is apparently is nothing!.
No, I'm more interested in what is your actual experience.
Your completely subjective, completely unobservable experience. For you, this is truth.
And your own personal truth is, IMHO, to be respected even more highly than the most well-designed placebo-controlled study.
This is the key to deeply individualized treatment. Which is the key to permanent cure. Which is the key to health.
In health,
Thu, 04/08/2010 - 04:23
Homeopathic Dosage Guidelines
Introduction to the 7-part series
I was inspired to this series of articles by a recent extended email dialog I had with a patient.
This patient not only asked me to answer several detailed questions around the specifics of homeopathic dosing / posology, but also indicated specifically that they wished me to answer by email, rather than by phone or in person, such that they could save my responses for future reference.
As I typed on and evening faded into morning (sigh ... :) ) , I ended up asking a few questions of my own:
Without further adieu, here are the links!
If you find the information presented useful, feel free to link to them as a resource ... or present them to your legion of Twitter followers, as the case may be ;)!
Thu, 04/08/2010 - 03:04
Homeopathic Dosing & Posology:
Post #7 in a 7-part series
If ______________ is a suppressive medication - which basically means anything with the prefix anti - or if you notice yourself having any discernible response to it another food, drug, environment, emotional influence, etc. (essentially ___________ could be anything!), please consider the following.
The only situation I hypothesize in which it would be an OK idea to take a suppressive medication is where the healing process has been stimulated to occur, but is occurring way, way too fast, producing a great aggravation. As mentioned above, however, I rarely see aggravations at all in my practice, and those which I do see are so minor and short-lived as to not cause the patient any real distress, and certainly not enough to be worth worrying about.
That said, I do not advise any patients to come off of anything - especially not prescription drugs that have been prescribed by another doctor. However, I often find that a truly good remedy is able to act through pretty much any suppression (albeit potentially more slowly) and that, after a while on this remedy, the patient themselves decides they feel such improvement as to wean themselves off the drugs (of course, with the consent of their doctor and the aid of a professional).....
Thu, 04/08/2010 - 02:45
Homeopathic Dosing & Posology:
Post #6 in a 7-part series
Like everything previously discussed, this is also individualized.
In general, the more acute and severe something is, the more frequent the doses can be without producing an aggravation, and the higher the potency the remedy can be (potency being another subtlety I haven't really discussed, one which may actually never be important in your case, but something I'll touch on in the future if it becomes necessary to change potencies)....
|
Naturopathic Medicine & Homeopathy TestimonialsThank you for the cream! My eczema is finally going away!
-Janet Mou, Vancouver, BC
The remedies prescribed had a huge impact on previously debilitating female health problems that I had struggled with for years.... I feel that I can live my life the way I want to without having to worry about menstrual pain or bladder issues....
-J. Sall, Port Coquitlam, BC
|